PianoTechnique.org logo

Hi, good to see you here!

Priorities...

10 years ago by
A Pianist
ok, so my DVD is on it's way... After reading the book, participating in several masterclasses, having several private lessons with Alan and seing the DVD excerpt now, I have to say the following about his aproach: I find the overall aproach, the general importance of investigating anatomy, 'quality of movement' as well as the 'hand-arch-structure' all very good, helpful and obviously so much better than many other 'systems'. But... Movements/structure of arm and hand still come across as priority no 1 in this teaching. At least, that is what i perceive. From my own (painful) experience I can only say that these teachings are incomplete, if the most important (balanced) relationships of the head, neck, torso, pelvis and spine are not clearlyand unmistakenly priority no 1. No muscle-group (e.g. the important hand-muscles) can work optimally in isolation. Just take a look into a good anatomy bookand see where for example _all_ the nerves of hand/arm are passing through and where they originate. My hand was in much trouble, because of problems with over-tense muscles in the shoulder, torso and neck.. not because my hand wasn't doing it's job. Of course a 'good hand' has helped 'some', but it did not eliviate the root-cause. What do you think ?
10 years ago by
A Pianist
I couldn't agree with you more! OK, so if I agree with you, why are the materials I have released so one-sided? Because they address a perceived gap in the information that's available. There are lots of other people working on the whole body relationships so essential to good playing; I don't know of anyone other than myself who focuses in on what I focus on. And I think it is needed. I see the positive results with many of my students. I have had the experience of working on the hand's structure and function and watching in amazement as the student's whole body organization improves BECAUSE their hand is no longer exerting a 'black hole' influence on the whole system. I have also seen cases where a pianist cultivated exceptionally fine overall body organization, only to have the hand still be a catastrophe because it didn't know what it was doing! But what you say is absolutely key and absolutely right: 'No muscle-group (e.g. the important hand-muscles) can work optimally in isolation.' This is of absolute importance, and a fundamental principle of Feldenkrais. In Feldenkrais we often WILL work on a part in isolation, but we always then relate it back to the whole. The work in isolation aims to enrich the kinesthetic sensation of that particular part, in order to free it from parasitic contraction (contractions that serve no movement purpose), and finally to enable that part to work BETTER in conjunction with the rest of the system. If I work on the hand alone and let it remain in isolation, I do that hand a disservice - and I have to admit that I have made that error more than once. In much of my work, improved hand function DOES lead to improved overall body organization, but this is precisely because the hand and arm are NOT at that point working in isolation. However, I realize that when you & I worked together, I got stuck in my own 'specialty' and that did not help you - at least, not as much as I could have helped you if I had remained a 'pure' Feldenkrais practitioner with you for instance... and for that I apologize. And if you did get help elsewhere, I am really glad! One more thing: please be aware that my whole 'approach' or 'method' is still very much a work in progress, as are the effects that my investigations have had on my own playing. In fact, over the past several months, I have discovered for myself precisely what you describe: how optimal whole body organization is a necessary ingredient, a support, to optimal hand and arm organization. Lately my improved body organization, especially a radical reorganization of my shoulders and hips, has led to me being able to fulfil my own precepts concerning hand structure and function far more effectively than I ever did earlier on! For instance if I sense that my BODY is generating rhythmic pulse rather than my arm alone, there is a much more vital, profound and virile sense of rhythmic and musical health in what I do. So I am at this point working on bringing whole body organization more and more into my teaching. But I think this increased attention to the whole body does not invalidate my previous attempts to address the perceived lack in our overall body of knowledge about Technique, by focusing in on the hand and arm. I still feel this was needed and that its validity stands. Thank you very much for an especially meaningful post. AFF
10 years ago by
A Pianist
Thank you for your comprehensive answer! Indeed, I feel like there is some kind of synergic back-and-forth from specifics (like fingers or hand) to whole-body and vice-versa. I had to free shoulder-/torso-muscles to get my first finger-joint going, and now that it started working better, I can free my arm/shoulder/torso even more... and so on. ..and no need to apologize! I was well aware that just a few lessons can go only so far with a complex thing as piano-playing. It was your book that gave me hope in the first place back in 2003, and I am looking forward to your next one.
10 years ago by
A Pianist
Just to let you know that in my own investigations I am more and more focused on the whole body and how its organization feeds the hand and fingers. Especially the relation of the legs, hips, pelvis and lower back in sitting... it'll be in the next book! best, AFF