10 years ago by
A Pianist
Recently, I've actually been starting to wonder if there's a very simple explanation that runs behind these kinds of exercises- regarding the concept of alignments where the muscles seem not to have to do anything. Although the end product is so low in effort, it can seem like the muscles do nothing at all, I'm becoming convinced that the exercises actually serve to trigger a very simple action of extension in the finger (which can keep the key depressed without need for additional pressure from the muscles of the arm). Personally, I've been finding that seeking to perceive this small effort when doing such exercises has actually been extremely useful. It's not that I'm saying it would be necessary to notice it at all times, but I think there's great value in perceiving the key muscular action- in order to then go on to forget about it (without risk of losing it and going on either stiffen or collapse instead).
Rationally, I can only see two obvious explanations for how a finger can be prevented from completely giving way, either when moving a key or keeping depressed. If it's extended to the limit of the joints motions, it could not double back any further, once you get to a certain point. In this case, the muscles might do very little- but you'd have to question how healthy it would be to rely on the joint itself to bear such forces and those with flexible joints would end up doubled back into all kinds of weird positions. It would be likely the finger would have to grip slightly inwards. Alternatively if the forces would act to make the finger curl up in an unwanted way, this can be countered by an action that serves to extend and straighten out the finger.
It's not that I'm wishing to question the value of the skeletality explanation and exercises by any means. However, I've often found it difficult to really pinpoint exactly what I'm looking to find, or to know how close I am to finding it. Particularly in the past, what I thought was a low effort state was actually pretty seriously stiff. For that reason, I think it helps to know what the relevant activity actually is while performing such exercise, in order to be able to monitor how efficiently it is being applied. I still value the exploratory exercises, but find it useful to have this additional point of conscious focus.
I'm currently working at pinpointing the exact activity that is required within any good quality of balance- and only then going on to treat it as if it were achieved without effort at all. Rather than try to trigger the balancing actions of the muscles using the subconscious alone, I'm finding that a conscious awareness of slight extension action as the source of most balances has been making me much better at achieving a stable but low effort hand. When relying on the subconscious approach alone, I still tend to lose the feel very easily. However, with the ability to consciously bring in a touch more of the extension action, it's possible to put things rapidly back on track if my hand starts reverting to floppiness or stiffness.