10 years ago by
A Pianist
The main reasons for me are both physical comfort and ease of mental organisation. When passing 3 and 2 over the l.h thumb on B I find the position very cramped. If I go into that position from the thumb on the A, the fingers go on the same keys. However, the preceding 4 on B gives me much more comfortable access to that position. It goes a lot smoother than when you are straight on 3 on C sharp and opens out everything more. Couple that with the fact that it's mentally easier to conceive the coordination of fingerings between the hands in the same way as C sharp minor (and pair the two scales together) and it seems vastly easier to me. If you already learned the regular fingering and are happy, then it's only an option. However, I believe it's vastly easier for anyone learning the scale from scratch. I don't believe that the idea that "it's easier to turn onto black keys" applies here- due to the trouble of getting the 2nd finger ready to play the D straight after the C sharp.
Regarding the rest, just a few thoughts:
I don't want to sound like I'm out to turn a positive into a negative, but is the left hand actually working better or just less intensely? This is what I've started to wonder in my own playing. My left hand is vastly less capable in most ways. Is it just that the more active hand exposes the problem of reactions more? One thing I've realised is that I spent a lot of time on pure pulling exercises away from the keys and that it's usually my right hand that I practise with the most. While this action is valuable, I realise now that it's specifically what screws up wrist alignment, if it's creating a reaction due to an indirect path. I suspect that my right hand got to caught up in the strength of the pulling action and that it missed that this path is not direct enough for the keys. The left hand is much less developed in general- and hence didn't come to overuse the indirect path as my right hand did. As my right hand gets better at correcting the path of movement, I'm realising that it's largely much better developed. I just wasn't using it's capabilities in the best line. Now I need to come back to my left and get a lot more intensity out of the finger activations- but hopefully in the direct path from the start. The greater capability of the right was simply making the problems of indirect paths show up more, I believe, compared to the lazier left hand actions.
Personally, I'd recommend a lot of Alan's Tai Chi walking exercises- so you stop pulling indirectly to the line of the key so much. I think this is where conscious understanding and "feel" need to complement each other. My feel had become so geared towards the circular path, that I was always pulling my wrist out of alignment. For that reason, I've had to consciously understand how to perform a straighter action and use that to develop a new "feel". Due to issues that I had not previously understood consciously, I developed a feel for something severely problematic- rather than a feel for something that is truly efficient. I'd recommend avoiding pure knuckle pulls altogether in exercises and concentrate on getting the lengthening action so instinctive that nothing is ever pulling you out of alignment.
Also, Alan got me to do one where you slide back and forth on a finger against the keybed. It's good for feeling "skeletality" (but I found that the feel sticks all the better since I realised that this essentially about using the lengthening action to find an efficient balance without tightening or clenching). This is really good for lenghthening out any bunching in the arm too, to get that chain state of balance.
introduction of the lateral axis approach gives more control with arm weight but doesn't allow me to change fingers with more ease or play long arpeggios. (when passing the thumb under the 3rd finger from the RH the other fin3. the gers tremble; the same thing happens when having to change the 4th with the thumb in Chopin's Waltz; I have to find a way of releasing tension especially when enganging in passages that include arpeggios over 2 or more octaves).
I'd try the idea of preliminary weight, as described here.
For me, this idea of weight as preparation has been the cure to the collapses and sags that Alan associates with armweight schools. It doesn't train you to collapse down, but rather trains you to feel what activity is needed NOT to collapse down.
I read a chapter of all thumbs last night, also, that resonates on the same issue. Alan speaks of starting with the thumb DOWN, rather than up. If it's too far up, it will have to go down or be stiffly held up. If it starts trying to rest weight against the key (not enough to depress it at all!) then it's possible to make the action all about freeing yourself up and away. This issue has been one of the biggest breakthroughs of all for me. Creating this interaction between slight weight and finger action before the key starts to move also helps perceive the direct line of activity, that sends maximal available energy straight into sound.