10 years ago by
A Pianist
The more difficult the music, the fewer options you will have to get it right. A bump from the arm may give good results in a slow piece, but it will obviously get you nowhere in virtuoso pieces.
The physical component in piano playing is not about form (shape of the hand) but about FUNCTION and ACTIVITY. Although this may not be obvious immediately, this is what Alan Fraser's method is about. Nobody here propagates a fixed hand position. And just to make sure: neither will you see Alan or anybody else here on this forum state that you should not have a sound image in your head, that you should not listen to what you are doing.
but.....here's the most important thing,
1. is it good to hear(this is the most important that you have to think,if this isn't then the next or next next thing will be nothing)
Yes and no. In the end, listening is indeed paramount for good results but it is not always the key to a problem. Example: Let a student play a free beautiful trill on c-d in the middle of the piano with 2-3 of their dominant hand. No tempo indications, etc. It should just be like the voice of a nightingale. Oh, that was beautiful, wasn't it? Now let them play that same trill just as beautifully with 4-5 at the same location. Oh, they can't do it? What happened to their ears? How about their other hand? Can any finger combination there get the same results for that same task on that same location by just "listening" to the sound image in their heads? There is an underlying basis of body coordination that should be present before the ears will magically dictate high-quality results.
Again, what is comfortable at a slow tempo may not work in faster tempos. To play the more difficult repertoire, you have minimum options to get it right. Unfortunately, too many people with very good ears but poor body coordination get themselves into trouble, and sometimes they are even forced to quit playing.
Paul