10 years ago by
A Pianist
I saw Louis Lortie play the 24 etudes in Montreal the first time he did it in public, back in the 80's. I had heard through friends that he was planning to tear the keyboard apart in Op. 10 #1, that it would be so brilliant that nothing like it had ever been heard.
I was disappointed.
So I understand very much where you are coming from with this post. Sorry to hear that what he offered back then hasn't changed much - no maturation process in the 25 intervening years...
The sad thing is, his pianistic lineage would APPEAR to be the same as mine but in fact is not. He studied with Marc Durand who was a student of Yvonne Hubert, the doyenne of Montreal piano teachers who had been Cortot's assistant in Paris for many years and who produced Ronald Turini, Andre Laplante, Janina Fialkowska and other greats. I studied with Phil Cohen who was Hubert's assistant for many years and now is curator of the Hubert archives at Concordia U. in Montreal.
Somehow I feel Cohen offers his students the gold of that teaching but every Durand student I've ever heard somehow misses the boat. I don't know why it is that two students of the same great teacher should have such radically different teaching styles and results but there you have it...
On the up side, I can promise you some much more satisfying etudes very soon - I am currently involved in editing Kemal Gekic's versions recorded earlier this year in Japan and can tell you that none of the complaints you list above apply to these performances...
AFF
PS By the way, Lortie is a dedicated and thoughtful musician. After completing his piano studies at Universite de Montreal, he went back to school at McGill as a theory student, and one thing he did was to learn and perform all the Bach 2-part and 3-part inventions. I admired his desire to learn the heart of the music he was playing and NOT just be a "virtuoso." Perhaps in the performance you heard, the spirit was willing but the flesh was weak?