10 years ago by
A Pianist
I thought it was a very nice performance, obviously very professional and polished. On the other hand I did not find it to be by any means great. (by concert pianist standards) It sounds like most other professional recordings. On closer inspection of her hands she does not seem to be as internally stable as a top virtuoso will be. That can be hard to see at first glance. I have attached at the bottom a link to a performance that I feel is superior and a cut above the average recording. Kemal's fingers seem to stick to the notes more and visually the stability that I think is lacking in Alice's recording is most definetly not lacking hear. If you listen carefully you hear a far greater range of sonorities which are blended together with much greater subtly, the melody is clearer and shaped much more smoothly/with greater direction, and the light touch that you mentioned is apparent throughout yet the lightness resonates more. Listen to how Kemal shapes the phrases (1:35 to 1:46 - magical). I am going to post a second link here to a recording of Kemal playing the op.25 no.12. This is perhaps an even more extreme example of the difference between very good and great when it comes to tone production and phrasing. I have yet to find another recording of the ocean etude that even comes close by any other pianist. Even more so than the Liszt etude the Chopin etude shows the difference between master interpretation/technique and general professionalism.
- La Campanella
- "Ocean Etude"